Canadians for Language Fairness

End the unfairness of official bilingualism. Stop wasting our tax dollars.

Why should the Official Languages Act concern us?

What do you know about the Official Languages Act?

The Official Languages Act (OLA), passed in 1969, is a Federal law which is enforced at the federal level and one other province i.e. New Brunswick. The province of Quebec has passed several anti-English laws (Bills 22, 178 & 101) that effectively make French their only official language. The provinces of Nova Scotia passed the French Language Services Act (2004) as did the province of Ontario (1986), and the province of Prince Edward Island (2013). Limited service in French is offered in each municipality in each of these provinces in varying degrees.

What's wrong with that?

Elevating a minority language to equal status with the majority language is creating an over-emphasis on the minority language, especially when that minority language is concentrated only in the Eastern provinces of Canada, namely, QC & NB. Further using that minority language as the criteria for employment at the federal level and increasingly at the provincial level is creating a work-force which over-represents the French-speakers. French-speakers are the ones most likely to be bilingual as they grow up speaking the language. Non-French speakers do not grow up speaking French and learning it at school does not make them fluent, especially as the educated French is very different from the colloquial French.

The 2011 Census showed that "self-assessed" bilingual Canadians make up 17.5% of Canada's population, the figure of those who can pass the language test is only about 12%. The Treasury Board (2014) showed that 31.9 % of the total Federal Public Service are Francophones in a country that is made up of only 21.3% mother-tongue French-speakers (2011 census). This over-representation of French-speakers in our public service concerns us greatly.

The limited supply of bilingual Canadians & the over-emphasis on a minority language as a criteria for employment has resulted in a lowering of academic & professional standards in our governments. Many high-level positions are filled by people with just secondary school certificates or equivalent.

As French is spoken widely only in Eastern Canada, this has led to Western Canadians being left out of the picture. The division and disunity brought about will eventually destroy Canada.

This is why you should be concerned.

Read More


23 April 2017

CBC's "The Story of Us" + French Rally in Ottawa

The CBC doesn't seem to be able to bend over backwards far enough to please any "special interest" group which receives massive amounts of funding to pay these perpetual whiners.  Pity the "silent majority" has no such well-paid champions.  This 10-part series was put together as part of the celebration of Canada's 150th birthday bash.  I haven't seen it myself but if you have, I would welcome your comments.

I asked John Robson & Conrad Black for comment - see below for what they had to say.

Kim McConnell

National Post


News MPs to grill CBC over docu-drama; The story of us


A House of Commons committee is asking CBC representatives to testify about the controversial history docu-drama The Story of Us.

The 10-episode weekly series, which began airing at the end of March, is supposed to recount Canadian history in commemoration of the 150th anniversary of Confederation.

It has faced a public backlash over its representation of francophones, indigenous people and some regions of the country. The premier of Nova Scotia, for example, criticized its failure to acknowledge Samuel de Champlain's first settlement in Port-Royal.

At the crux of the issue for MPs is the fact CBC is a public broadcaster, using public money to fund and present programming. The series is also connected to Canada 150 celebrations and featured an introduction from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

New Democrat MP Pierre Nantel successfully moved last week to have the House heritage committee ask CBC to appear. In a statement Thursday, CBC spokesman Chuck Thompson said the broadcaster is aware of a pending committee invitation but hasn't yet received one. "When we do, we will work with the committee to set a date," he said.

The motion is worded broadly, asking CBC "to discuss the efforts of the corporation, by virtue of its mandate, to ensure the representation of First Nations, Inuit and Métis, and of francophones, and concerning the corporation's activities in the context of the 150th anniversary of Canada."

But MPs understood in committee that they were really talking about The Story of Us and whether or not it paints an accurate picture of Canada's early days.

"I think it's been very lazy," Nantel said of the series, and "a big mistake." In an interview Thursday, he said he wants to ask the public broadcaster, "How can a decision be taken so lightly?" The CBC did apologize earlier this month, saying in a statement "our intention was never to offend anyone or any group, nor diminish the importance of any of the stories that were not included." Though post-episode "live digital conversations" were announced, no changes to the program are anticipated.

Nantel is especially incensed about how francophones are portrayed, and that Quebec actors weren't hired to play francophone characters. He complained translations weren't done in the province either, so translated lines are in the accents of French-speakers from France.

"How can you not hire French-Canadian (actors) to play French Canadians?" he asked as well. "How can you bear to have a fils du roi speak with an English accent? It's a super joke."

The series was produced for CBC by Bristow Global Media Inc., headed by CBC veteran Julie Bristow, in partnership with U.K.-based company Nutopia. The latter has used an "internationally successful format," a Bristow press release says, to put out similar Story of Us programs in the U.K., the U.S. and Australia.

Nantel said this is "sausage-machine TV" - though he acknowledged it's probably "good TV" - and suggested CBC shouldn't have gone for an international format that may have "led to some compromises."

In an emailed statement Thursday, Bristow said the show was never intended to be a "typical, comprehensive historical documentary series." Although she regrets that some people feel misrepresented by the show, Bristow said "this kind of public conversation is a good thing" - even if it's "thorny, complex, and even sometimes painful."

Marie-Danielle Smith

I contacted John Robson with this question:

John, do you feel that the CBC has represented Canada's history accurately?  Why is it that the French are always complaining about inadequate exposure when they've already been given more attention than any other group in Canada?  They have had the 1982 Constitution written to give their language & culture far more than any other group in Canada, using their minority status as a reason to demand overly generous proportions of our resources to inflate their own worth.

What's your opinion on this?


From: John Robson []

Sent: April 21, 2017 10:52 PM

To: Kim McConnell

Subject: RE: MPs to grill CBC over docu-drama; The story of us

Hi Kim,

I can’t claim to have watched the program in question. I suspect Cartier’s shirt wasn’t always clean though I don’t hold it against him.  But I find this hoo-hah hilarious given that the CBC bends over backwards to avoid offending Quebecers, aboriginals, women and on down the PC line, and yet finds itself on the grill.


Same question to Conrad Black got an entirely different response:

The French founded the country and the French-Canadians were not defeated by the English-Canadians; the French were defeated by the British. They joined the country with co-equal status to the British Canadians and are entitled to that. They cannot be compared to "other groups." What they do not have any right to do is break up the country.

Best, CB

I am deeply disappointed with Conrad Black's response. Given my previous correspondence with Lord Black I am sorely tempted to believe - now more than ever - he is more liberal than I had wanted to believe...  If breaking up the country to maintain sanity and not become overrun and overwhelmed by the French fact then that is the way to proceed. If not Quebec leaving, then the West!  Quebec has, FINALLY, reached the ultimatum of the "magic formula" which is full-bore welfare (blackmail) subsidies from the rest of Canada to "keep" it within the federation - a federation it cares for the least except as an entity that cuts cheques. Black, in my opinion, is being disingenuous to say the least as he, better than most, knows his Canadian history. He prefers to have a Canada hobbled and saddled with extortionist blackmail tribute rather than see the country break up.  But like all cancers that are allowed to fester for too long, inaction leads to an inevitable premature death of the patient.  With the coming Trump effect - the gathering economic storm - perhaps leading entities in Canada's officer class may begin to wake up from the Soviet-socialist style of governance slumber and begin to rethink the role the current French presence is having on Canada......



Conrad is pretty good most times but he missed one fact ..

The British Armies defeated the French Army in North America. The locals helped out of course but there was a world war going down. The resultant arrangements were curtsy of England.  And as it subsequently transpired ...ill advised.

Bear in mind that there were approximately 40,000 habitants in Quebec and around 2 million colonists in North America. Anything the french received was hardly by right. The disparity in relative strengths hardly needs emphasising. They were lucky to have not been transported back to where ever!


New date for The Intimidation Rally in Ottawa  

Just as we thought, the French Intimidation Rally was changed to May 31, 2017.  We have decided not to mount a counter rally as we haven't got the kind of organization (well supported financially by tax-payers) that the French groups can muster.  We encourage observers to go & take pictures & record the gathering at City Hall.  We'll wait for a media report - from either the English or the French media.  Then we'll see if the Mayor & the 12 Councillors who have consistently said NO will capitulate to the French demands.  With the City of Ottawa running a deficit of $41 M. as reported in 2015:

The $41 million deficit indicated is truly laughable insofar as Council approved the City budget last Fall (2016) and "there will be an additional $116 million in additional debt authority according to City treasurer Marian Simulik..." (Nepean-Barrhaven News, Thursday, November 17, 2016, p. 45, written by Melissa Murray.) It was not made clear in the article what the actual (or projected) 2016 City deficit is or will be but nevertheless, $116 million was added to the City's debt in 2016. Debt, debt, debt and deficits and reckless spending without end imperiling future generations with sustainability.  Now begin to factor in the Trump effect on Canada where, eventually, prices and wages and benefits and government employees/government size will need to shrink to maintain a semblance of competitiveness in the world, and we can only scratch our heads wondering where the money will come from to reach a balanced-budget, debt-free City....

Al S.

I really cannot see how the City can afford to increase their budget for services in both languages.  As a reminder, the 2016 budgeted amount for French language services was $3,064,000.  The potential amount (if the Federal govt. expenditure on OB is indicative) is $20 MWe absolutely cannot afford that.  The French lobby will refute that figure of course but everybody knows they cannot be trusted.  It cannot be argued that such a policy will cost a substantial amount more than the City is currently paying & that it will work against the interests of the majority English speakers of Ottawa.

Kim McConnell

(Google translation below)

OTTAWA - Initially scheduled for April 20 , the rally to support the bilingual Ottawa designation will finally take place on May 31.


In a bilingual message broadcast live on Facebook, on Wednesday, April 19, the Franco-Ontarian Student Group (RÉFO), the Association of Francophone Communities of Ottawa (ACFO Ottawa) and the Franco-Ontarian Youth Federation (FESFO) Invite the population to mobilize on Wednesday 31 May.

"This citizen day bilingual Ottawa is a unique opportunity to mobilize you and show your support for Ottawa to become an officially bilingual capital in this year of the 150 thanniversary of Canada," says Co-Chair Refo Geneviève Borris.

The initiative is primarily a "day of public support for bilingual Ottawa".

"Bilingual Ottawa means demanding that our two languages ​​be equal and no matter what our language, origins or neighborhood, we can get services from our municipal government in the official language of our choice," explains Soukina Boutiyeb, Treasurer Of the ACFO Ottawa.

In a statement, the Vice-President of ACFO Ottawa, Alain Dupuis, insists: "As a result of sustained dialogue and information efforts with elected municipal officials in recent months, the time has come for the public to repeat Strong support for this approach. This will help convince the city council once and for all that this cause is just right, both for the francophone and anglophone communities in Ottawa. Official bilingualism would not only be a gesture of unity and respect for all our communities but would have a definite positive impact on business and tourism in our capital. "

Two activities

Two activities are scheduled for May 31st. Starting at 9:30 am, a walk from Strathcona Park in the Sandy Hill neighborhood will take you to City Hall. At the end of the day, starting at 6:30 pm, a citizen rally will be organized at the Desmarais Pavilion of the University of Ottawa. Both events also include bilingual musical performances and performances.

"The march aims to send a clear message to the city council that bilingualism is important for all citizens of our city," concludes Boutiyeb.

The rally takes place while a majority of councilors are very hesitant to support the initiative,  as demonstrated by a survey initiated by #ONfr last November. Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson has always opposed Ottawa's official bilingual designation.

Comment from one of our directors

I am still of the opinion it will be better not to have a counter-demonstration when the French zealots are having theirs. It is doubtful we can match the numbers when they are able to muster school children (allegedly) to add to the numbers with signs and placards and lots of noise.  Besides, the mayor and most of council is already on record as opposing the idea of OB for Ottawa.  I am more interested in what the follow-up reaction at City Hall will be.  If, as a result of this demonstration, the City decides to bring it to a vote anyway on Council there will be a notice, it will be on the agenda of the appropriate standing committee. In other words, if it is decided to bring this to a vote there will be sufficient time to muster forces at that time to appear at the committee proceedings and to write letters. 

Should Council be foolish enough to place this item on an agenda, it will become a huge embarrassment to the French cause when we parade the results of OB in other places not to mention why Gatineau was not included... and the howling success of the world's laughing stock known in Quebec as the language police... 

Al S.

From a reader in NB where the French speakers are dominating the scene because the English-speaking majority are not fighting back as hard as they should:

"Please, please keep up the fight to end official bilingualism. Living in New Brunswick I am faced with what forced bilingualism has done to this province on a daily basis and  it is not a pretty picture for anyone who is not Francophone and does not speak French. Do not allow the Elite to force the officials into making Ottawa an "Officially Bilingual" city.  This is a takeover of our very way of life and the values that our ancestors fought and died for. The Elite are blatant bullies and must be stopped."


Read More


21 MArch 2017

Two Important Reminders

I don't usually circulate two messages so close together but this is urgent.

Number 1

I was just told about a CBC production by Montreal film maker - John Walker.

The film will be airing on the CBC Documentary Channel this Wednesday night at 9pm ET.

The trailer is available at this link:

Quebec My Country Mon Pays

Quebec My Country Mon Pays charts the aftermath of Quebec’s Quiet Revolution in the 1960s.

CBC film - Mon Pays

Quebec My Country Mon Pays charts the aftermath of Quebec’s Quiet Revolution in the 1960s. This social justice movement unleashed dramatic cultural and political changes that led to the separatist movement, the FLQ terrorist crisis and, ultimately, the exodus of more than 500,000 English-speaking Quebecers. Montreal-born filmmaker John Walker reveals his own complicated relationship with the province in a film brimming with love and longing.

Walker’s roots in Quebec go back 250 years. Yet he’s struggled his entire life to find his place and to feel he truly belongs. In Quebec My Country Mon Pays, he explores a very personal story through the lens of a cast of characters including three generations of his family, childhood confidantes and artistic contemporaries – Denys Arcand, Jacques Godbout and Louise Pelletier – as well as Christina Clark, a young person whose experience today mirrors Walker’s own in the 1960s and ‘70s, and Emilie Gélinas, a young Quebec independentist.

In a quest to make sense of a divisive and transformative time in Quebec’s evolution, they each wrestle with their memories, their decisions and the continuing reverberations.

Many of our readers were among the half million Anglo-Quebecers who left Quebec because the French extremists wanted Quebec to belong only to French-speakers.  P.E. Trudeau's repatriated 1982 Constitution made it possible for the French to make life uncomfortable for non-Quebecois.  Forcing French "down their throats" was unacceptable - it was easier to sell up and leave for parts of Canada that still operated in English.  The film talked about the violence of the FLQ, generating the Fear Factor that is so successful in chasing people out of their "safe spaces" in the post WW2 world.  People had just gotten used to peace & the "good life" & they didn't want to fight.  It was much easier to leave when they could.  Those who decided to stay accepted the dominance of the French language.

If you wish to comment after watching the film, please feel free. 

Kim McConnell

Number 2

The next important reminder is that those who want to help choose the right leader for the Canadian Party of Canada (CPC), must register as members of the party before March 28th.   If you want to register, go to:

The final vote for the person to lead this party will be May 27th.

This is not an attempt to persuade you to support the CPC - that is entirely your decision.

There are other parties to vote for - do your research & find out which one best satisfies you.

The Libertarian Party of Canada -

The Cultural Action Party of Canada -

The Canadian Action Party -

There is just one thing I want to say - the Liberal Party under the leadership of PM Justin Trudeau will destroy Canada in just a few more years.  That party is piling on the debt like you won't believe; it is also determined to flood the country with immigrants from troubled areas of the world who will bring their problems with them & Canada will inherit the problems now tearing Europe apart.   There are other things about the Liberal Party that will forever destroy them in the eyes of this organization - the Official Languages Policy & the destructive Equalization Payments policy are the two worst features of the disastrous 1982 Constitution.  You may want to add other features like the unelected Senate.    

Whatever bothers you, don't expect any ONE party to have all the answers.  There are just too many problems so think about what bothers you most.  Someone put together a set of questions - if you want to help me identify the five (5) most important ones, I would be willing to send them to all the politicians of all the parties.  This might help them understand us better.  So here's the survey:

Survey - which would you identify as your 5 top concerns?

1.We need to screen immigrants to ensure that they support Canadian values, including democracy, free speech, and equal rights for women.  Face coverings should never be allowed during citizenship ceremonies and legal proceedings.

2.        We need to drastically reduce the rate of immigration, to moderate the home price inflation that has made home ownership unaffordable for many Canadians in Toronto and Vancouver.

3.        Canada's "multiculturalism" policy provides a slush fund for politicians to buy votes. This is bad enough in itself, but it also balkanizes Canada, separating and dividing our various ethnic groups. In contrast, the "melting pot" is a better model for integrating various ethnic groups to create a harmonious society. Therefore, all "multiculturalism" spending should be terminated.

5.        The Equalization Payments Policy discourages self-sufficiency in provinces as "have-not" provinces are not encouraged to spend responsibly, knowing that the money will come from the "have" provinces or that the money will come from adding on to our already massive national or provincial debts.   

6.        Official bilingualism has gone much too far. Many Anglophones find that only Francophones can qualify for government jobs, and that the civil service is increasingly dominated by Francophones.

7.        University professors should not be required to address students with invented pronouns. The absurdity of this requirement has been explained very well on Youtube by Prof Jordan Peterson, who teaches psychology at the University of Toronto.  Total responsible Freedom of speech should be allowed.

8.        We need to restore balance to the political climate on Canadian university campuses. These days, universities devote too much effort to left-wing political indoctrination and to nurturing extreme left-wing political activism. Universities should expose their students to a diversity of views, and encourage debate. Universities that coddle students with "safe spaces" and cave in to extremist demands should lose their government funding. Debate is essential for democracy, and the over-paid administrators are responsible for having failed us on this issue. They need to be held accountable.

9.        The CBC should be privatized, and/or funded by voluntary donations. Canadian taxpayers should not be forced to support the CBC.

10.      We should support Quebec Separatism - they want to be treated as if the are special because they have the French language & culture as their defining character.  They should be allowed to decide whatever they want to do without being supported financially by Canada outside Quebec.

Read More


25 March 2017

M-103 + Ottawa's Mayor Being Intimidated

The language issue does not affect all of Canada to the same extent - the readers out in Western Canada are not as worried as the readers in Eastern Canada (Quebec, New Brunswick, Ontario, PEI & Newfoundland).  So I try to include other items when I circulate to the whole group.  The issue of M-103 affects all of Canada so maybe you might want to read about that?

Motion 103

I guess by now you know that this motion has passed (201 MPs voted in favour of the motion, and 91 MPs voted against it.) 

Faith Goldy of The Rebel reports:


Our readers have sent their comments:


Dear Mr. Hehr

I concur with your evaluation that the rise in hate crimes against Muslims must be stopped. However, the wording of the bill (as it is being presented to us in the media) is poorly thought out, although targeting hate against Muslims, it would leave, if worded in that form, the definition of “islamophobia” open to wide interpretation, and indeed would favour one religion only. This is being reported as being a part of the bill, and I suspect that people think it will be included at some point, then passed using the Liberal majority. 

One must look at all aspects of the bill before making it law, or risk having an otherwise worthwhile bill  fail over one point of contention. In its present form, with the word Islamophobia present, it would have the potential of empowering people of Muslim faith who do not view our society as fair and equal, or want a Sharia governed society, an opportunity to use the laws of Canada to punish those people with whom they simply disagree, citing that those people are displaying “islamophobia” as THEY would define it or could define to a sympathetic judge, thereby putting that targeted person through a living hell, and cowing others that simply do not agree. If that term is not included in the bill, then that bill, I think, is a good idea; if it is included, then the motion must be re-written to omit that reference. 

Also, as I am sure you know, Islamophobia is fear of Islam, a human fear which cannot be a crime any more than fear of any other religion. Acting with violence or bigotry against those of other religions, however, should be a crime, and of course, using violence is Hatred of Muslims should be a crime, or at the very least strongly disapproved of in Canadian society, same as hatred of Jews, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Hindus, and all people because of their religion.

This legislation must pertain to ALL religions, not just one. The MP who put forth the motion to include that word in the bill should be made aware of this fact.

Thanks for your time,




So your hateful, fascist motion has passed.  You may be congratulating yourselves, but you must know that Canadians will never obey this ridiculous attempt to censor and silence us. 

Canadians have enjoyed Freedom of Speech since the founding of this country and NO ONE can take it away without giving us a say in the matter. 

Any attempt to enforce this ridiculous motion would be nothing short of  F A S C I S M and will be clearly recognized as such.

You may have been successful if you had included ALL religions, but singling out one for special attention and preferred treatment is simply laughable.

Something good will come of this, though  Everything muslims do will now be under a finely-tuned microscope.  There will be no tolerance in Canada for the bad behaviour we see exhibited in other parts of the world.  The videos are everywhere, making this a proven, demonstrable fact and nothing you can do can change that.  We witnessed it just yesterday and will no doubt witness it again tomorrow. 

Canadians will now wake up and realize the dangers facing them so that what’s happened in Europe can’t happen here.

That’s a good thing, and for that I thank you.

Perhaps you should go back to Pakistan where this kind of thing is commonplace because it never will be here.

Canada is a civilized country and will remain a civilized country in spite of the bad immigration policies of the current administration.

Subject: French Intimidation of Mayor Watson

March 24, 2017

Am I saying the obvious when I say that the French in Quebec are shameless?  This is not true of ALL French people (most are probably very nice people but they're listening to a lot of very greedy, very self-absorbed people who think that the French language & culture must be promoted, preserved & protected at ALL costs).  Being the minority that P.E. Trudeau has chosen to empower in the 1982 Constitution, they are using that power to bully themselves into a dominant position.  Quebec is broke & will remain broke because of the Socialist mindset in that province - their total dependence on the Equalization policy enables them to continue living off the other provinces while demanding to be in charge.  When the country runs out of the ability to borrow, the taxpayers can always be counted on to dig deeper into their pockets.  If you haven't heard of the "BAIL IN" policy, you should find out about it - this is how bankrupt governments solve their problems.  

The battleground currently is in Ottawa where Mayor Watson is facing a huge attempt by the French activists to intimidate him into capitulating to their demands.  Just read the Google translated article below & tell me why we have NO English-speaking leader on the side of the councillors who said, "NO"?  Politicians depend on votes so please contact your councillor & let him/her know how you feel.  If you need the contact information of your councillor, please contact me.

Kim McConnell

OTTAWA - 20 years after the big rally to save Montfort Hospital, thousands of Franco-Ontarians gathered to remember and celebrate their victory. The debate surrounding the bilingual status of the City of Ottawa was repeatedly invited at the heart of the event.


In a moment of great emotion, Gisele Lalonde, a true face of the struggle against the closure of the hospital, went up on stage accompanied by lawyer Me Ronald Caza and Michelle de Courville Nicol. For long minutes, she waved the Franco-Ontarian flag under the applause of a grateful crowd.

"You have given so much. You can be proud, you can say mission accomplished! The next generation is ready to take your torch, "councilor Mathieu Fleury said, for the lady of the Francophonie in Ontario.

Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson spoke to pay tribute to Franco-Ontarians fighting to save the hospital. But some of the crowd did not hear it that way. "Bilingual Ottawa! Ottawa bilingual! Ottawa bilingual! ", Shouted for several minutes a few dozen angry spectators.

#ONfr has tried to get his reaction, following this cold reception of a part of the public.Mayor Watson categorically refused to answer our questions. He left the show in a flash, right from the first musical issue.

If Gisèle Lalonde warmly supports the movement in favor of a bilingual capital, she feels that the time may be wrong.

"I thought it was valuable here, because it still came with us to celebrate," she said in an interview with #ONfr . "Ottawa should be bilingual, that's for sure! In fact, the province should be bilingual, "she added.

Councilor Mathieu Fleury said he understood the anger of some citizens. "Do not judge, people have the right to emotion. Obviously, it is sensitive. We did it with Montfort. We built a momentum, we will get there (with Ottawa city bilingual), "he argued.

According to him, convincing Anglophone citizens of the Capital more than ever. "In the francophone community, we are united. We must seek our support in the English-speaking community, "he insisted.

A show full of emotions

For nearly three hours, many Franco-Ontarian artists took the stage intoning hearts of the songs known in the province's French-language repertoire.

Damien Robitaille, Chuck Labelle, Gabrielle Goulet, Serge Monette, Moonfruits, Yao and many others. Zachary Richard, strong voice of the Francophonie, came to interpret a song he dedicated to Gisèle Lalonde.


As for celebrating the victory in saving the Montfort Hospital 20 years ago, it was done at great expense to the taxpayers of Ontario.  The hospital was slated for closure because it was run so inefficiently.  The French activists saved the hospital, at a cost of $300 Million & turned it into a bilingual (mostly French) hospital.  The worst of the deal is that we are serving a lot of patients from Quebec because we cannot turn them away.  The Emergency facility is filled with Quebecers because medical services are so poor in Quebec.  There was an attempt to stop the flood of Quebecers who are not emergency-type patients & our own, legitimate tax-payers are forced to wait for hours while Quebec patients are served.

Egan: Montfort tries PR on ER as it worries about growing tide of Quebec patients

Kelly Egan, Ottawa Citizen

More from Kelly Egan, Ottawa Citizen

Published on: September 11, 2014 | Last Updated: September 11, 2014 4:00 PM EDT

The Montfort has just launched an outreach campaign that aims to discourage certain Quebec patients from showing up in the emergency department on Montreal Road. Pat McGrath / Ottawa Citizen

In 2009, about nine per cent of all patients to the Montfort Hospital’s emergency department were from West Quebec.

Today, the figure is 18 per cent, or almost one in five.

The financial consequences are many. In 2008, there were 15,555 individuals from the Outaouais who sought treatment at the Montfort (or more than 40 a day) at a cost of $6 million to the Quebec health-care plan.

In 2012, the number of Montfort-bound patients had risen to 18,573 and the cost soared to $15 million. And this at time when Montfort is doing its best to meet care standards set by Ontario’s Ministry of Health.

What to do?

The Montfort has just launched an outreach campaign that aims to discourage certain Quebec patients from showing up in the emergency department on Montreal Road.

A new brochure reminds patients with “chronic symptoms” that care is best provided by a family physician or a walk-in clinic in greater Gatineau.

“Emergency room physicians at Hôpital Montfort cannot ensure continuity of care for patients insured by the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec,” reads the brochure, with an abundance of bold type.

Those with a Quebec health card will still be treated but directed for followup to a family physician or clinic in Quebec.

The hospital is walking a fine line, as hospital president Dr. Bernard Leduc explained.

It is not turning Quebec patients away, nor is it sending them to the back of the bus. The hospital, he said, only wants to manage the patient’s expectations and prevent frustration. The brochure also points out that Ontario physicians have no “special privileges” to order diagnostic tests in Quebec or do referrals to specialists across the river.

From experience, the Montfort knows that Outaouais patients with chronic conditions — perhaps waiting for knee or hip replacements — will sometimes try an Ontario hospital as a way to more quickly connect with a specialist.

“Because access in some specialties is not easy in Quebec, they’ll come because they’ve been waiting long on a waiting list to see a specialist and they think when they come to Hôpital Montfort to emergency, they’ll either have better access or better access than if they just wait in the Quebec system,” Leduc said.

The hospital is taking steps now, he said, because the number of Quebec patients visiting the francophone hospital has grown so much.

Montfort is, in a way, a victim of its own success. After being on death row during the 1990s, it won successive court battles and emerged even stronger. A $300-million expansion was opened in 2010, doubling floor space.

Further enhancements since then have lifted the emergency department response times from the bottom of the list among Ontario hospitals. So, ergo, francophones from anywhere are flocking there.

It is a politically infused debate.

The Canada Health Act requires that health coverage be “portable” within provinces, but the concept has many shadings.

“The portability criterion of the Canada Health Act,” says Health Canada, “requires that the provinces and territories extend medically necessary hospital and physician coverage to their eligible residents during temporary absences from the province or territory.”

Statistics provided by the Régie, Quebec’s equivalent to OHIP, show how deeply the Outaouais relies on specialized health care in Ontario.

From 2008 to 2012, Quebec has sent $408 million to seven Ottawa hospitals. In 2012, the Ottawa Hospital led the way with 21,055 Outaouais patients, at a cost of $33.4 million. The Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario was next, with 19,244 patients and $24.6 million in transferred billing.

Just to illustrate the impact of location and language on the cross-border migration, Queensway-Carleton Hospital in Ottawa’s west end only had 980 Quebec patients that year, and $639,136 in transferred fees.

Leduc said the brochure, which was launched this week, is not driven by financial considerations — the Quebec system generally pays physicians less — or to discourage so-called “doctor shopping” by Outaouais patients stuck on long waiting lists.

“We’re not changing what we’re doing,” he said. “We’re not turning people around when they arrive in our emergency department.”

The brochure closes with a statement that reads like a warning, from a Quebec government website: “Generally speaking, the Régie does not reimburse the full cost of health care services received outside Québec and certain services are not covered by the Health Insurance Plan at all.”

Well, one can’t fault Montfort for trying. And Leduc is probably too polite or hand-tied to say it out-loud: the present course is unsustainable.

If the patient’s fever doesn’t come down, something is going to burst.

To contact Kelly Egan, please call 613-726-5896 or email


17 Per cent of Montfort Hospital ER patients from Quebec in 2012-13

700 Number of Quebec mothers giving birth at Montfort in 2013

5,955 ER visits from Quebec patients to Ottawa Hospital in 2009

8,095 ER visits from Quebec patients to Ottawa Hospital in 2013

93 Total annual payments, in millions of dollars, from Quebec to seven Ottawa hospitals in 2012

184 No. of Quebec patients at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre in 2012

 19,244 No. of Quebec patients at  CHEO in 2012

About 100,000 Quebec patients seek care in all of Ontario each year.

Read More


24 February 2017

The Holy Grail

Gordon Chong wrote an article in June 2016 which caught the attention of one of our readers.  That article is reproduced below.  I reread the article & was startled by the stark honesty of these two sentences: 

The Holy Grail of perfect bilingualism has been an extravagant elitist exercise in self-deception in Canada — a self-indulgent mirage.

It is a fantasy that has been a colossal waste of taxpayers’ money.

I tried to contact Gordon through the Toronto Sun but could not get through to him to congratulate him.

Last night, one of our readers forwarded another article from Gordon which repeated the same truth that few other member of the media dares to expose.  We know that it is sacrosanct to tell Canadians that this very expensive policy is a total failure & it takes a very courageous person to expose that truth to the beleaguered tax-payer.   The Socialists & their philosophy that supports all "feel-good" policies, regardless of how senselessly extravagant these policies are, are proposing that we should spend endless amounts of tax-payer dollars propping up languages that have little practical relevance to the majority of the people in the country.  This applies to all minority languages but the one that gets up the noses of the non-French majority is this push for the Frenchification of Canada.  The fear of being left out of the "power-clique" of Canada has forced the closure of English schools as more parents think that French-Immersion is the only way to ensure that their kids get jobs.  Most Federal government jobs are being made "officially bilingual" even where it is not necessary.  The Conservative government, before they left office, identified 250 government offices that were slated for losing their bilingual status (obviously because they thought the guideline of "service where warranted" was not adequately met).  However, the Liberal government is moving to reverse that motion & expand the need for more bilingualism.  This is occurring widely at the Federal level except where they are unable to recruit the very best, in which case they are forced to recognize that qualification & experience dictate that they have to give the position to a highly qualified but unilingual English-speaker.  The OB policy has worked primarily to benefit the mother-tongue French-speakers at great cost to the taxpayer, not to mention the unity of the country which is more & more divided between the East & the West.   

Gordon Chong has pointed to several prominent Canadians who have succeeded, professionally, economically & socially & the key to their success was impeccably precise English.  So why are we moving to close more English-language schools, turning them into French-Immersion schools when it is a fact that they have not been such a huge success?  Do we want more & more of our children to graduate from our schools with an inadequate command of the English language, having wasted countless hours learning Parisienne French which is not even understood by the locals?  We have engaged a well-known researcher to speak at our up-coming St. Patrick's Day Brunch coming up on March 18th.  The topic of her talk will be "The Success or Failure of French Immersion".  If you live in the Ottawa area, watch out for our flyer coming out next week.  If you want a copy of this flyer to be mailed to you, please contact me with your address.

In the meantime, let's look at what Statistics Canada has predicted about the language situation in Canada:

The part that caught my attention was this:

Decline in the proportion of the English- and French-mother-tongue populations up to 2036 

The proportion of Canada's English-mother-tongue population could decline from 58.7% in 2011 to between 52% and 56% in 2036, while the proportion of the French-mother-tongue population could decrease from 21.3% in 2011 to 17% or 18% in 2036. French would by far remain the most prevalent mother tongue after English, with between 7.5 million and 7.8 million speakers in 2036. In comparison, in 2011, none of the other mother tongues had a population of 500,000 persons.

The proportion of the French-mother-tongue population could decline in both Quebec (from 79% in 2011 to between 69% and 72% in 2036 in the three main projection scenarios) and in the rest of Canada (from 3.8% in 2011 to between 2.7% and 2.8% in 2036). Other scenarios with different internal migration patterns show that the decrease in the proportion of the French-mother-tongue population in Canada outside Quebec could be more modest.

Meanwhile, the share of the English-mother-tongue population could either grow or decline in Quebec (from 8.2% in 2011 to between 7.9% and 8.8% in 2036), mainly due to immigration, but decrease in the rest of Canada (from 74% in 2011 to between 64% and 69% in 2036).

A note from one of our researchers:

Please pay attention that "...the report Language Projections for Canada, 2011 to 2036 (Catalogue number89-657-X), was produced with financial support from the Department of Canadian Heritage and IRCC".

It is a well-known fact that researches, commissioned by any client, are usually according to guidelines given by the client so the note above is not without reason.

Are we being manipulated to make the French-speakers fight harder against assimilation & to keep the French language prominent by telling them that their language & culture are in danger?  We know that they are given massive amounts of funding at all levels of govt. to pay for activists to put pressure on provincial governments to increase the number of French Immersion schools, French-language colleges & universities.   Our researchers have discovers a lot of information on this.

With the reinstatement of the Court Challenges program, expect to see more money being spent by Francophone parents on actions such as this:

In the meantime, mother-tongue English speakers refuse to understand what's going on, complacent as ever.  Ironically. Canadians who are non mother-tongue speakers may be the ones to persuade Canadians to abandon the failed Official Languages policy.  Spend the money to benefit ALL Canadians, not just one group at the expense of the majority. 

The next step is to get a politician from any party to voice our concerns.

Kim McConnell

The case for unilingualism

The limited success of Canada’s multilingual policies should tell us something about human nature

By Gordon Chong

First posted: Saturday, February 18, 2017 06:43 PM EST | Updated: Saturday, February 18, 2017 06:50 PM EST

The recent movement to teach aboriginal languages, plus the release of Statistics Canada population projections showing first languages other than French and English are on the rise, has raised the anxiety level of some Canadians.

Especially so for francophones.

Although Canada has been officially bilingual since 1969, bilingualism has never really taken root, except in government circles.

While not a total failure, it is not the Nirvana envisioned by its architects, despite the effort and money invested.

Ever since the law’s enactment and after every student cohort has been through the immersion mill, there is the inevitable reassessment.

The graduates’ judgments are revealing.

While grateful for receiving the opportunity to learn French, few feel completely confident using it.

There have always been bilingualism skeptics — not just about French, but about all ancestral languages.

The skepticism received scholarly support with the 1987 publication of Languages and their Territories by the late Professor Jean Laponce of the University of British Columbia’s political science department.

The credibility of Laponce’s argument was bolstered by his having learned English when he was 25 years old.

The essence of his thesis was captured by the late Toronto Sun columnist Doug Fisher, a former CCF MP representing Port Arthur, a riding with a large aboriginal population.

On Sept, 6, 1987, Fisher wrote: “First, the human brain resists a second language. (Laponce notes the friend who said, ‘when I have the word ‘escargot’ why would I need ’snail’?’) Second, languages within the same geography compete fiercely. Third, the users of a ‘mother tongue’ who are in the majority seek — and get — domination and priority for their language. Fourth, users of a minority language in a minority position fall back on enclaves and protective rules, and establish their language’s domination wherever they can control the politics of its territory. Think of Canada, of Quebec, of New Brunswick, of St. Boniface, Man.”

The late Dr. S.I. Hayakawa fervently supported unilingualism.

He was a scholar also personally experienced in dealing with an ancestral language, who was president of San Francisco State University before becoming a U.S. Senator.

The Vancouver-born, English professor’s book, Language in Thought and Action, was required reading in many U.S. undergraduate English courses.

Although immersed in the Japanese language while growing up, a 1990 Toronto Star story revealed Hayakawa was “the chairman of a group called ‘U.S. English’, an organization concerned that ‘our traditional language is becoming irrelevant as foreign languages become more and more widely accepted in our country,’ and pressing for passage of a constitutional amendment to make English the nation’s official language”.

Bilingualism for the individual is fine, but not for a country” said Hayakawa.

With both scholarship and personal experience leading to skepticism about bilingualism, as well as the rather sketchy success of our French immersion efforts, governments should not fund ancestral language retention.

Self-confidence comes with achievement. A good education with a firm grasp of English — our lingua franca outside of Quebec — accomplishes that, not a feeble grasp of a seldom used ancestral tongue.

Funding this initiative reminds one of doctors writing prescriptions for antibiotics to pacify unreasonably demanding patients and creating unintended consequences such as antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Dr. Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Indigenous Affairs, must realize, for example, that funding aboriginal languages is the wrong prescription for the many serious and often life-threatening issues that plague our aboriginal communities and that need to be addressed.

It will simply create sympathy-resistant Canadian taxpayers.

Teach English in schools

Experience has shown it’s the key to success in Canada, not French immersion or retaining ancestral languages

By Gordon Chong

First posted: Saturday, June 11, 2016 08:27 PM EDT

Is the ability to speak multiple languages really a key to future success?

Bilingualism, even trilingualism, has resurfaced recently as an issue.

French immersion’s success is being questioned, while some argue the retention of indigenous or ancestral languages is essential for future success and self-esteem.

The Halton District School Board is considering changing entry into its French immersion program so that it starts in Grade 2, as opposed to Grade 1. The other change would be to move to full day instruction, rather than the current half day.

Four years ago, the Peel District School Board capped French immersion at 25% of total Grade 1 enrolment, and currently uses a lottery when demand exceeds the system’s supply of spaces.

These moves are not without controversy, because demand is exceeding capacity in a number of jurisdictions across Canada.

There are several reasons for this.

Many parents want to give their children a leg up for the future.

Some do it for the intellectual stimulation they think it will provide their children, others to get their kids out of the regular stream and into a more “elite” environment.

A few do it because they are inspired by a sense of patriotism.

It has become what Globe and Mail columnist Marcus Gee describes as a “privileged island in the school system, populated disproportionately by kids from better-off families.”

But world-wide, French usage is in decline, while English, Mandarin Chinese and Spanish are ascendant.

As if French immersion is not already under enough of a challenge, there is a move afoot to teach aboriginal languages.

The teaching of aboriginal history, culture and languages has long been advocated by many, including Adrienne Clarkson, our former Governor-General.

In a recent Globe article, entitled, “All Canadians must tell their stories,” she tried valiantly to make the case that aboriginal languages “require a different support and understanding”, meaning government financial support.

While flawlessly written, it is not persuasive.

She claims aboriginals must be able to “tell their stories” in their own languages, that this will instil self-esteem and confidence, presumably leading to success in the Canadian mainstream.

Examples abound that refute this hypothesis.

Prominent Japanese Canadians like the late George Tamaki (a prominent tax lawyer), Tom Shoyama (a deputy federal finance minister), Dr. Irene Uchida (a world-renowned geneticist) and our climate guru, David Suzuki, all owed their success to a flawless grasp of English.

None apparently felt a particular need to “tell their stories” in Japanese.

In fact, at a conference I attended a number of years ago, Suzuki responded to a question about retaining a Japanese identity and language in Canada by asking: “Why do we need to do that when there are millions of Japanese in Japan who are perfectly capable of doing that?”

The inherent truth in his rhetorical question was self-evident.

My own experience with Chinese language retention has been informative.

I was intensely immersed in Chinese early, because Chinese-speaking relatives lived with us.

I went to a Chinese-language school from the age of seven until I reached Grade 13, five days a week after regular school for two hours a day.

Here was the problem: Most of us would rather have been anywhere else rather than at Chinese school and we spoke English outside the classroom.

The Holy Grail of perfect bilingualism has been an extravagant elitist exercise in self-deception in Canada — a self-indulgent mirage.

It is a fantasy that has been a colossal waste of taxpayers’ money.

For aboriginals, I believe it will do little, if anything, to improve their lot in life.

Ancestral language retention is best left to the initiatives of each ethnocultural group.

Aboriginal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould’s success was not founded on her ability to speak her ancestral language. Neither was Clarkson’s.

The key to their success was impeccably precise English.

From a long-time supporter of our battle:

Unfortunately, Kim, there is so much that is hidden from the populace.

The elites have their vision of what Canada should be, and they work to that end without telling us. Trudeau said that a nation is like a great ship. The populace gets on board thinking that their destination is the one that they were told. Then in the night the captain changes the course without the people knowing it, so that in the morning they end up not where they wanted to go, but where the captain wanted them to be. That was Trudeau with his vision of the new Canada.  Lots of immigrants from non-traditional places, predominance of French in the government, corporations, everywhere. Socialist programs. Metrification for no reason, in spite of the costs. We could go on and on. His son is no smarter or different. Unfortunately, some of the "conservative" leaders know no better either.

I thought O'Leary might be a reasonable candidate to support, but with his belief in abortion, I have lost him. Now I am looking at supporting Kellie Leitch for the Conservative leadership.

Ontario is screwed no matter what they do, but anything would be better than the Liberals or NDP there. Good luck...

All the best, my friend. I am glad to know you...


Read More


27 March 2017

April 20 Planned Rally For OB Ottawa

So many issues to worry about & all the French activists want to do is keep pressuring the City of Ottawa into caving in.  They have called for a rally at City Hall on April 20 & they're looking for pro-French supporters.  The English-language group would like to send a group opposing these loud-mouths wanting to use any excuse to dominate in Ottawa, and then to spread the Quebecois power into Ontario.  Most of us know what's happening but very few English speakers know what to do.  Maybe you feel that we've already lost the battle - after all, we have NO political party willing to fight for us.  Public servants are too afraid of their French bosses to speak up.  One of them wrote:

Hi Kim : On the subject of Islam I believe this letter really hits the nail on the head.

On the subject of language discrimination in the public civil service, our ADM has sent out his survey again to see if anything is improving. This is the same survey that got me a meeting with him last year. I talked to Chris about it once, but I never heard from him again. When P.E. Trudeau came to power in 1968, only 9%  of civil servant in the National Capital region were Francophone. Today that figure is close to 90% with almost all managers being Francophone. As I mentioned earlier the government's definition of discrimination and harassment cover everything except language and/or linguistic ability.   With over 90 % of the managers being Francophone (in my dept. 21 out of 23) it’s not hard to understand why Anglophone have fear of reprisals and therefore do not want to come forward and complain. In my case my wife has said many times that she fears for my safety and job security if I complain too loudly.  This will continue until the government changes these definitions of discrimination.

Anglophones have nothing to fall back on, at best the complaint falls on deaf ears and nothing gets done. At worst you can end up black listed, dismissed, transferred to some remote outpost, or simply harassed until you quit!  The challenge is to get enough people united as one strong voice too loud to be ignored and tell the government that we have rights and we want them respected!

I can probably arrange another meeting with our ADM, but one on one I don’t think I will gain very much. As head of the CLF he might be interested in hearing your opinion on these matters.   What we also need is some key Anglophone players who are willing to come forward and verify that we are being discriminated against every day, that is not going to be easy to do.


Doesn't that bother you?  What can we do to push back?

My suggestion is that we ask public servants to form a group that I will only contact by b.c.c.  We already have some who are still in the public service and we have people who are retired who may be  willing to come out to help.  If you're on this list, you will be informed as to what action can be taken.  If you have suggestions as to what can be done, we are willing to listen.  WE NEED YOUR HELP!

In the meantime, read the message below & tell me if you are willing to let the French intimidate the City Councillors into giving in.  Remember that, just like the Francophones in Quebec, these people don't know when to stop!!  The more they get, the more they want!!  We back off, they gain ground!!!


OTTAWA - Activists do not want to let go of Ottawa's bilingual designation. A rally will be held on Thursday, April 20 to raise awareness of the issue.

SÉBASTIEN PIERROZ  | @sebpierroz

The initiative developed by the Franco-Ontarian Youth Federation (FESFO), the Franco-Ontarian Student Group (RÉFO), the Association of Francophone Communities of Ottawa (ACFO of Ottawa), and the activists for the designation , Is above all "a day of public support for bilingual Ottawa".

The rally would be a march to Ottawa City Hall in the afternoon, with the rallying in the evening. "We are in the process of confirming the final details," said Alain Dupuis, Director General of OCHA and Vice-President of ACFO in Ottawa.

A precision made during an interview with various media during the Rendez-vous francophone of the Mayor of Ottawa, Friday March 24th in the morning.

"We invite the Francophone and Anglophone communities to participate, all those who support official bilingualism ... We also want to look for schools and school boards."

The rallying that evening, the place of which is not yet known, would be the occasion of a series of speeches of francophone and anglophone leaders.

"We are in 2017, the year is not over," said Mr. Dupuis. Moved by the bilingual Ottawa initiative, activists still want to see the adoption of a municipal by-law in 2017 to recognize the bilingual nature of the federal capital and preserve the city's long-term French-language services policy .

This Mayor's "francophone luncheon" remains an opportunity to "network", but also for the activists of the bilingual Ottawa initiative to present their arguments to the municipal councilors present. Eight of those elected were part of the scene this morning.

"A city, two languages" ... but not officially. #ottawa #onfr

- Ajà Besler (@ajaBesler) 24 March 2017

The record of official bilingualism was however not present in the speeches of the 11 th Go francophone from Ottawa Mayor. "We were not expecting a mention of official bilingualism," says Aja Besler, president of ACFO in Ottawa. "For our association, it was important to show our presence."

Unforgettable lunch

The event did not depart from the rule of previous years. First with a speech of a few minutes Jim Watson, time to remember that the City of Ottawa is always looking for ways to improve municipal services. Then the development of a Francophone initiative. This year, Anne-Marie White, the director of Ottawa's New Scene, was the guest of honor to discuss the conclusion of the arts center's work.

Asked by the media about the bilingual designation shortly after these "festivities", Mayor Jim Watson has, as usual, justified his refusal of a bilingual designation: "The City of Ottawa passed a formal law in 2001 that says City of Ottawa is bilingual (...) Most people do not know that it is not just a policy, it is an official law. It's a surprise to many people when I explain. "

A reference in fact to the adoption by the City Council of Ottawa on May 9, 2001 of the famous bilingualism policy modeled on that of the former City of Ottawa.

Candidate for his own succession for 2018, Jim Watson insists. "The great majority of francophones have other interests, not just bilingualism. They support my positions on taxes, transit, cleaning up the Ottawa River. There is a reason why 80% of the population thinks I do a good job (...) I won all the francophone districts in the last election. It's not just anglophones who support Jim Watson. "

Whistles during the show on Montfort

Still on Wednesday the mayor had received whistles once on stage in front of 3000 participants in the show's 20 th anniversary of rallying Montfort. "Bilingual Ottawa! Ottawa bilingual! Ottawa bilingual! "Chanted a few dozen people. Mr. Watson had left the event shortly after this incident.

"It's democracy, the people have the right to support or not support the position of politicians," says Watson. "I am a little disappointed when some members of the francophone community attack a member of the Algonquin community who speaks only English. It is not polite to aboriginal people. "

"People have shown their dissatisfaction with the position of the mayor," Mr. Dupuis summarized.

Valerie Price of ACT for Canada has sent a reminder re:  Wednesday March 29th

ACT! For Canada is pleased to present an evening with


On Wednesday, March 29th, 2017

Trevor Loudon is a celebrated author, filmmaker and political commentator from New Zealand, who has been researching the radical left for more than 30 years and is the foremost expert on left-wing organizers of mass protests.

He will be discussing the radical left-wing philosophy of mass protests, the unique relationship between communism and political Islam as well as Motion M-103 before the Canadian parliament.


Date:                              Wednesday, March 29, 2017

Time:                              6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.

Location:                        Ottawa Public Library, Main Auditorium

Address:                         120 Metcalfe St. (corner of Laurier Ave. W.)

Cost:                              $20.00;  students with ID $15.00 (cash only!)

Messages from Canadians For Language Fairness only come from two email addresses: or

We have noticed other addresses that are bogus addresses designed to mislead people:

Lang Fairness Administration :



Read More


02 December 2016

CLF thanks the Ottawa City Council

We would like to express our gratitude to all the councillors & Mayor Watson for continuing to resist the call for the City of Ottawa to be made "Officially Bilingual" & to surrender Council's prerogative to decide what the city can afford in providing services in both languages (English & French).

We are very fortunate to have a very active supporter who is an excellent researcher who knows how to access the French media.  It gives us the ability to keep an eye on what the small group of activist Francophones are doing & we get a lot of very useful information that we don't have the resources to obtain otherwise.  In the following link:

Councilors were contacted by #ONfr to rule on the question: "We would like your answer" yes "or" no "to the question: Would you support official bilingualism in the City of Ottawa if the approach does not impose additional costs and does not cause job losses? "The elected were free to respond by email or by phone.

That question refers to the greatest threat to increased bilingualism, additional costs, especially if the policy is entrenched in law & can be enforced by the courts.  The cost of bilingualization will obviously increase as everything is duplicated so common sense will tell you why it is being resisted by councillors who are worried about the cost of ALL services to be provided by the city.  The following will show you how the cost of bilingual service has doubled since the passing of by-law 2001-170:

1.       Cost of FLS in 2005 was $1.75 M (for copy of message from Andre-Cadieux, please contact Kim at

2.       Cost of FLS climbed to $ 2.6 million in 2014

2.       Cost of FLS in 2016 was $3,064 M (for page from adopted budget 2016, please contact Kim at  )

The next important point is that, no matter what they say, it will cause job losses to the majority unilingual English-speakers as more positions will be required to be bilingual.  Surely, none of you would be so naive as to believe the lie that OB will not cost jobs to English speakers?  We already know that many city employees come from Quebec to take jobs from residents who live on this side of the river & pay taxes to the city.  Do those Quebecers help pay for the upkeep of the city?

We wish to thank the councillors who said a firm, "NO" but also the ones who are "undecided but favourable to the status quo" & the two councillors who are did not like the question.  These are all councillors who have not been intimidated by the powerful French lobby.  We will keep your names on our list of councillors to promote in the next municipal election.

Kim McConnell

BTW, an item just forwarded by a reader says that several recreational French/bilingual programs, paid for & set up by the City at the insistence of the French pressure groups, will be cancelled.  Reason?  Insufficient response!!!

The article is available in French here:

OTTAWA - Half of French activities offered by the City of Ottawa must be canceled due to insufficient enrollment.

Finally, we wish to express our best wishes to the Councillors for the upcoming festive season with a hearty:



Read More


Here's how Justin Trudeau's government will ensure that French-speakers (whether they are mother-tongue French-speakers or not) will be able to demand French-language services right across Canada. 

"Where numbers warrant" will be met by boosting the numbers artificially.  You'll note that the English-speakers in Quebec will still have to live under the French-language zealots who want the French language dominant in Quebec.

Folks, Bill S-205 died on order table when Harper govt fell. It was tabled again as Bill S-209 in December 2015 when Trudeau came to power. It aims to amend Part IV (Service to the Public) of the OLA, changing the definition of "francophone" a la Ontario FLSA.***

Issues related to implementing the Official Languages Act

Commissioner lends his support to Bill S-205

In April 2015, the Commissioner of Official Languages presented his position in support of Bill S-205, which aimed to update Part IV of the Official Languages Act. In his briefFootnote 11 to the Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages, the Commissioner gave three reasons why Part IV needs to be updated.

First, he noted that the criteria set out in section 32(2) of the Act to assess potential demand for services in the minority language are not inclusive, because they do not take into account all of the people who use the minority language in the public or private sphere. For example, the current criteria as they are applied exclude people whose first official language spoken is not the language of the minority but who:

  • speak the minority language at home (as can be the case for francophiles, anglophiles and newcomers);

  • speak the minority language in the workplace; or

  • receive their education in the minority language.

Second, he pointed out that significant demand is defined in relation to the proportion of the minority population (i.e., the 5% rule). However, the chief factor to be considered in determining significant demand in a region served by federal offices should be the presence of an official language community that shows signs of vitality. (It means presence of even one French school, according to their previous discussions - E.B.).


Third, he stressed that Bill S-205 is important because it codifies the principle of substantive equality by explicitly imposing on federal institutions the duty to provide service of equal quality in both official languages and to consult with the English and French linguistic minority population concerning the quality of those communications and services.

The Bill died on the order table after the federal election was called in August 2015 and was tabled again in December 2015 as Bill S-209. The Commissioner reiterated that this bill makes an undoubtedly significant contribution to fulfilling the purpose of Part IV of the Act and helps official language communities to strengthen their identity, to develop and to thrive.

Analysis needed of the impact of the Official Languages Regulations on the vitality of official language communities

In 2013, the Société franco-manitobaine made public a complaint that had been filed with the Office of the Commissioner concerning the Official Languages (Communications with and Services to the Public) Regulations.Footnote 12 The complaint alleged that the method used to determine the first official language spoken in order to establish what constitutes significant demand does not take into account large segments of the population that speak the minority language and would want or be likely to use it in federal offices.

The objective of the investigation was to determine the nature of the obligations incumbent upon the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat under Part VII of the Act in the context of the Official Languages Regulations Re-Application Exercise. The exercise seeks to review and update federal institutions’ language obligations every 10 years using census data: in this case, data from the 2011 Census.

In the spring of 2015, the Commissioner released his final investigation report to the parties involved. The Commissioner concluded that the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat had to identify the impact of the results of the re-application exercise on the vitality of official language communities that would no longer be receiving bilingual services because of changes in the linguistic designation of some federal offices. The Commissioner also concluded that the institution should present options to the President of the Treasury Board to mitigate the negative impact of these results.

Because the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat had stated that it did not intend to conduct an analysis on the impact of the results, the Commissioner concluded that it had not met its obligations under Part VII of the Act and that the complaint was founded.

The Commissioner therefore recommended that the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat undertake a thorough review of the impact of the Official Languages Regulations on the development and vitality of the official language communities affected by the results of the re-application exercise. He also recommended that the findings of the analysis be shared with the President of the Treasury Board, along with opinions and advice on solutions to be considered in order to mitigate any potential negative impact of the Regulations.

A follow-up is under way to determine whether the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat will be taking the appropriate steps to implement the Commissioner’s recommendations.

Société franco-manitobaine takes case to court

In February 2015, the Société franco-manitobaine applied for a court remedy in Federal Court under Part X of the Act. The Société petitioned the Federal Court to find that parts of the Official Languages (Communications with and Services to the Public) Regulations are inconsistent with section 20 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (and with several provisions of the Act) and to order the government to amend the Regulations. The Société maintained that:

  • the Regulations contain an unduly restrictive definition of the word “Francophone,” i.e., they do not make allowances for the recent expansion of the Francophone space to include mixed families, newcomers, people who are bilingual and people who are able to converse in French;

  • the use of formal numerical thresholds is inconsistent with the objectives of the Act; and

  • the Regulations were adopted without consulting the French-speaking minority, and they have not undergone any significant review or consultation since they came into force in 1992.

The objective of Senator Maria Chaput’s Bill S-209 was to correct the very shortcomings cited by the Société franco-manitobaine in its court remedy. The Commissioner strongly urges the government to update Part IV of the Act and to review the criteria for defining significant demand.

Recommendation 2

The Commissioner of Official Languages recommends:

  • that Parliament make Bill S-209 a priority so that the parliamentary committees examining it are able to conduct a diligent review; and

  • that, by March 31, 2017, the Treasury Board undertake an evaluation, in consultation with official language communities, of the effectiveness and efficiency of its policies and directives for implementing Part IV of the Official Languages Act.

Read More


Historical Overview of French-Language Services in Ontario


More than 40 years ago, the Government of Ontario recognized the need to provide French-language services to the province's Francophone community. The right to French-language services contained in the French Language Services Act came into effect on November 19, 1989. It gives all citizens who request French-language services the right to be served in French:

* in any head office of a provincial government ministry or agency;

* in most provincial ministry and agency offices that serve or are located in the 25 designated regions.

Today, about 80% of Ontario's Francophone population has access to these services.

The following is a chronology which highlights some of the major advances in French language services in Ontario. You can sort the achievements by year and by sector for easier reference.




Adoption of a Regulation on the provision of French language services by third parties on behalf of government agencies.

32 new public service agencies were designated under the FLSA since 2003, which brings the total number of designated agencies to 222. These agencies provide health services and support services for children, youth and women who are victims of violence.


The total funding for French-language boards for the 2010-11 school year was $1.24 billion, the largest investment in French Language education in the history of the province.

Ontario puts in place a French language policy framework for postsecondary education and training. The goal is to help provide Ontarians with more opportunities to study and train in French.

Substantial additional investments in infrastructure in the primary, secondary and postsecondary francophone educational sectors:

$248.9 million worth of construction was undertaken under the French Capital Transitional Funding component of the Grant for New Pupil Places in the primary and secondary school systems.

$84.8 million was invested in the postsecondary sector as well as in training for Francophones.



Adoption of the Franco-Ontarian Day Act. The Province of Ontario officially recognizes September 25th of each year as Franco-Ontarian Day as well as the contribution of the Francophone community of Ontario to the social, economic and political life of the Province and the communitys importance in Ontarios society.

Adoption of a new directive for Communications in French by the Ontario Government. Ministries and classified agencies are required to consider and incorporate the Franco-Ontarian communitys specific needs when developing and implementing communications strategies and tactics.


Creation of 266 new child-care spaces in French language schools.


Official launch of TFO in Manitoba.

The Ministry of Tourism and Culture launches two three-year pilot programs to address the needs of Francophone visual artists, arts organizations and collectives in Ontario.


Adoption of the Francophone Community Engagement Regulation under the Local Health Integration Networks Act. Establishment of 6 French language health planning entities (1 in Northern Ontario, 1 in Eastern Ontario and 4 in Southern Ontario) in order to provide advice and input on French language health services in their communities.

Inauguration of the new Montfort hospital.


Announcement of a $5.2 M investment for the construction of Torontos first Francophone womens shelter.

Opening of a 10-bed womens Francophone Shelter in Timmins.



Adoption of a new more inclusive definition of Francophone (DIF): 50,000 more Francophones identified, bringing the total Franco-Ontarian population to over 580,000.

Addition of a Youth Francophonie Award as part of the Ontario Francophonie Awards.

Release by the OFA on its website of a new General Statistical Profile of Ontarios Francophone Community in December 2009.


NewAmnagement LinguistiquePolicy whose goal is to help the provinces French language educational institutions and settings optimize the transmission of the French language and culture among young people, to help them reach their full potential in school and society, and to breathe new life into the francophone community.


As part of the provinces Accent on Youth Strategy, launch of a new initiative developed by the OFA in partnership with theAssociation franaise desmunicipalits de lOntario(AFMO) which aims to encourage young Francophones to learn more about municipal affairs.



The firsttats gnraux de la francophonie de Sudburywere held in November 2008. Bringing all sectors of the Sudbury community together in a planning exercise, this event made it possible to lay a foundation for setting priorities for the regions economic, cultural, community, social, and artistic development.

Each of these milestones has enabled Francophones to face the future with optimism and to focus their efforts on training the next generation of Francophone leaders. With its community partners and with private companies that have roots in the community, OFA launched itsAccent on Youth Strategyin 2008 to encourage young Francophones to socialize, work, and live in French.


TFO becomes an independent and self-governing organization with its own budgets, its own board of directors and its own offices.


Another milestone in the recognition of the French fact in Ontario was reached in 2008, with the introduction of French license plates for personal vehicles.



Creation of the Office of French Language Services Commissioner. Reporting to the Minister Responsible for Francophone Affairs, but independent of the OFA, the Commissioner is responsible for handling complaints relating to the FLSA, conducting investigations to ensure compliance with the FLSA and submitting special reports as well as an annual report to the Minister that is tabled in the Legislative Assembly.

Development of a French services accountability framework to be integrated in the annual planning process of each ministry.


Investments in the education sector are now making it possible to expand York University,Universit de Hearst, andLa Cit collgiale, and to expand French-language postsecondary program offerings in Ontario.



The year 2006 marked the 20th anniversary of theFrench Language Services Act. To celebrate this milestone in the history of French Ontario, the Government of Ontario created the Ontario Francophonie Awards as a way to honour Francophones and Francophiles who have made a valuable contribution to the vitality and well-being of Ontarios Francophone community. The OFA also created a travelling exhibition on the history of French Ontario, entitledLa francophonie ontarienne : dhier aujourdhui.

Francophones in eastern Ontario rallied around the project to create monuments to Ontarios Francophonie. On September 25, 2006, the 31st anniversary of the Franco-Ontarian flag, the first of six monuments in Ottawa was unveiled. It is a giant Franco-Ontarian flag symbolizing the history and contribution of the regions Franco-Ontarian community. This initiative has since spread to other Ontario communities, including Casselman, Rockland, and Sudbury.

Designation of Kingston under theFrench Language Services Act.

Signing of the Ontario-Quebec Cooperation Protocol on Francophone Affairs.


The growing number of French-language schools gives rights holders increased access to French-language education across the province.

Launch of thePolitique damnagement linguistique de lOntario, a language planning policy to promote the French language and culture, improve student achievement, and help keep young Franco-Ontarians in French-language schools.

Creation of an advisory committee on French-language postsecondary education.

Establishment of a permanent Elementary and Secondary French-Language Education Task-Force.


Establishment of an improvement program for French-language, rural, Northern, and First Nations libraries.


Implementation of the first phase of theStrategic Plan for the Development of French Language Services in Ontarios Justice Sector, in partnershipwith the francophone stakeholders, which aimsto improve, modernize and expand access toFrench Language Services in the justice sector.


Support for French-language school boards to plan for the provision of child care services under the Best Start Plan.


Unprecedented commitment of $125 million to expand Montfort Hospital co-funded with the federal government.

Establishment of a Francophone working group on health care reform, headed by the CEO of Montfort Hospital.

Inclusion in the preamble of Bill 36 on local health system integration of recognition that the requirements of theFrench Language Services Actmust be respected. The Bill also requires that the Francophone community be consulted both in the development of a provincial health system plan through the establishment of a French-language health services advisory council, and at the regional level by local health integration networks.


Creation of a website,Centre darchives des rglements municipaux, whichprovides the English and French versions of municipal by-laws.



Signing of the Canada-Ontario Agreement on French-Language Services providing $1.4 million per year over four years to increase the capability of the Government of Ontario to deliver French-language services and support the development and vitality of the Francophone community of Ontario.

Designation of five new agencies under theFrench Language Services Act. Since 1988, 201 agencies have been designated to provide services in French.


Commitment of $140 million to contribute to the development of French-language schools.

Signing of the Provincial-Federal Funding Agreement for French-Language Education and French-as-a-Second-Language Instruction, providing $301 million over four years for minority and second-language instruction at the elementary, secondary and post-secondary levels, as well as an additional $30 million to recognize that Ontario has the largest minority French-language community in the country.

Establishment of a permanent Elementary and Secondary French-Language Education Task Force to advise the Minister of Education on unique Francophone matters such as promoting French culture, reducing assimilation and helping to retain Francophone students.


Distribution of a Resource Guide for immigrant entrepreneurs to all the Canadian Embassies and high commissions abroad.


Adoption of anAct to amend the City of Ottawa Act, 1999, recognizing the bilingual character of the City of Ottawa. The amendment requires the City of Ottawa to adopt a policy respecting the use of the English and French languages in all or specified parts of the administration of the city and in the citys provision of all or specific municipal services.

Provision of $700,000 over four years to translate municipal by-laws and other key documents into French, cost-shared with the federal government.


Commitment of targeted funding to promote access to postsecondary education for Francophones as part of the $6.2 billion to be invested in response to the Rae Report.

Creation of an advisory committee on French-language postsecondary education charged with advising the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities on improving access to French-language postsecondary programs.


Creation of a help line for Francophone women who are victims of violence: 1 877 FEMAIDE (1 877 336-2433). Francophone women across the province can access this dedicated toll-free line anytime.



Creation of a Provincial Advisory Committee on Francophone Affairs. The committees mandate is to advise the Minister Responsible for Francophone Affairs on how to best meet the needs of the Francophone community.

Participation of Ontario at the Xth Summit of the Francophonie in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Designation of the City of Brampton and the municipality of Callander under theFrench Language Services Act. After an implementation period of two years, provincial government offices located in Brampton will offer their services in French. Because there are no offices of the provincial government located in the municipality of Callander, French-language services will be available at government offices in the City of North Bay.


Funding of $30 M allocated to the provinces 12 French-language district school boards as a first step in the implementation of the French-Language Education Strategy.

To help strengthen French-language education in Ontario, the Government launches thePolitique damnagement linguistique 2004. This plan is designed to help promote French language and culture, improve student achievement and self-esteem and help keep young Franco-Ontarians in French-language schools.


The Government adopts a Domestic Violence Action Plan. One of the objectives of this Plan is to improve access to French-language violence prevention programs and services in accordance with theFrench Language Services Act.

The Centre Victoria pour femmes and the Timmins and Area Women in Crisis announce the creation of a new Francophone Sexual Assault Centre.

Holding of tats gnraux sur le dveloppement des services en franais en matire de violence contre les femmes (conference on the development of French-language services in the area of violence against women). The purpose of the conference was to discuss issues related to French-language violence prevention programs and services, to discuss best practices and explore models for improved service delivery.

Investment of $1.9 million to support sexual assault centres across the province offering French-language services or serving Francophone communities.


Creation of a French Language Institute for Professional Development through which professionals in the justice system can increase their French-language abilities.


Creation of a Francophone Advisory Committee by the Seniors Secretariat in order to develop, implement and evaluate a series of information tours for Francophone senior citizens across Ontario.



A federal-provincial-community committee is set up to discuss Francophone immigration.


Announcement of a $7.4 M increase to the base funding of Montfort Hospital and a grant of $20.8 M for 2003-2004.


Citizens can request licence plates with the design of the Franco-Ontarian flag.



Eleven new transfer payment agencies are designated under theFrench Language Services Actas providers of French-language services. Since 1988, 196 agencies have been designated as providers of services in French. Of these, 66 have been designated since 1995.


Official groundbreaking ceremony atLcole secondaire de formation professionnelle et techniquein Ottawa.

Official opening ofCollge Boralcampus in Toronto, in the Fall 2002.


Signature of a memorandum of understanding between Legal Aid Ontario and theCentre mdico-social communautaire de Torontofor the 2003 opening of the first Francophone Legal Aid Clinic in Toronto.


Five-year memorandum of understanding between the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the French-Language Health Services Network of Eastern Ontario.


Announcement of funding for Francophone pilot projects in the area of violence prevention.



Games of La Francophonie 2001, Ottawa-Hull: the Ontario Government participates in the planning of the Games and hosts a pavilion that welcomes many visitors. Some 3,000 athletes and artists from 52 countries compete in these games, 85 of these competitors being from Ontario. In all, Ontario wins 3 medals in the Cultural competitions and 16 medals in the Sports division (8 of which are gold).

The Franco-Ontarian flag becomes an official emblem of the province.


Additional financing to improve legal aid services in French in Ontario.

TheCourts of Justice Actis amended to improve access to justice and simplify the administrative procedures to request a bilingual trial.


The Government of Ontario launches the Early Years Challenge Fund. In order to meet the needs of Francophone families, a special envelope 5% of the total Fund is set aside for projects within the Francophone community. Following consultations with Francophone stakeholders, a separate process is put in place to evaluate and recommend projects by Francophone groups.



Organization of the 4th Games of La Francophonie to be held in Ottawa-Hull in 2001.


128 long-term care beds allocated to Montfort Hospital, as part of the governments commitment to create 20,000 new long-term care beds in the province by 2004.


$4 million to train specialists to identify young Francophones who need special education services.


Five year agreement with the Federal government for the funding of French-language colleges, including some funding for theCollge dAlfred.

Funding toLa Cit collgialefor the development of a bilingual training centre for call services in the high technology industry.

Funding toLe Collge Boralfor the Centre for Excellence in Forestry of Northern Ontario.


The Ontario Tourism Marketing Partnership (OTMP) develops a tourism marketing strategy specifically for the Francophone community of Ontario and provides tourism information in French to Francophone consumers.



The Ontario Government attends the 8th Francophone Summit in Moncton where the Ontario Pavilion showcases Ontario products and services.


The Ontario Legal Aid, established under theLegal Aid Services Act, must provide services in French.



Renewal of theCanada-Ontario Agreement on the Promotion of Official Languages.

Five year Federal/Provincial Agreement for the financing of French-language school boards.


TheProvincial Offences Acttransfers responsibilities for the administration and prosecution of offences to the municipal level. The Act is accompanied by a memorandum of understanding whereby municipalities in designated areas agree to maintain the provision of services in French.



After 3 years of implementation, Francophones in the City of London officially have the right to receive provincial government services in French as stipulated under theFrench Language Services Act.


Creation of 12 French-language school boards (4 public and 8 separate) with funding equivalent to that of English-language school boards.


The OFA, together with the Ministry of the Solicitor General and Correctional Services and the Ontario Womens Directorate, implement an action plan to increase services to help Francophone women victims of violence.



Opening of two French-language colleges:Collge BoralandCollge des Grands Lacs, and a permanent campus site forLa Cit collgiale.

Multi-use school facilities are established in Kingston and Brampton.



Designation of a new area under theFrench Language Services Act. The City of London becomes the 23rd designated area to provide provincial government services in French. These services come into effect on July 1,1997.

Under the Act, another eight agencies are designated to provide some or all of their services to the public in French, bringing the total number of designated agencies to 130.

Provincial Francophone organizations now number 76 in comparison with 31 in 1986.


Amendments to theCredit Unions and Caisses Populaires Actenables the caisses populaires to offer a wider array of financial services and support to their Francophone clients. They can offer preferred shares to members, an important source of revenue to help them expand.

Financing to set up caisses populaires in under-serviced areas.

Amendments to theCooperatives Corporations Actprovides cooperatives with:

easier self-financing and ability to structure themselves as groups of partners rather than members; and improved access to support programs for small businesses.


First multi-use school facility set up in Longlac. (Fall 1994)

Capital funding for the construction of eight new French-language schools.

Dissolution of theConseil scolaire de langue franaise dOttawa-Carletonand creation of two autonomous French-language boards as of July 1, 1994: theConseil des coles publiques dOttawa-Carletonand theConseil des coles catholiques de langue franaise de la rgion dOttawa-Carleton.


Establishment of an annual Trillium Award to recognize Francophone authors and French-language literature.

A new community radio station for the Cornwall-Alexandria area goes on air.


There are now 52 Francophone daycare centres. In 1986, there were 3.


Establishment of a Francophone medical social services centre in Hamilton-Wentworth.



Designation of 24 agencies under theFrench Language Services Act(July 1993). (New total: 122)

Renewal of the Canada-Ontario Agreement on the Promotion of Official Languages.


Announcement of the creation of two new French-language colleges, one in Northern Ontario (Collge Boral) and one in Central/Southwestern Ontario (Collge des Grands Lacs).


Creation of a fund for Francophone cultural centres with the help of the Office of Francophone Affairs and the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Recreation.

The firstSalon du livre de Toronto, a French-language book fair, financed to a large extent by the government, is held in October 1993. It is the first event of that nature in Ontario.

The community radio station for Kapuskasing goes on air with the financial assistance of the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Recreation.


TheUnion des cultivateurs franco-ontariensis recognized as the official union to represent the provinces Francophone farmers.


TheCoalition franco-ontarienne pour le logementis recognized as the official representative for Francophones on housing issues.


Designation of the first two legal clinics under theFrench Language Services Act; one in Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry, the other in Prescott-Russell.


Establishment of theAssociation des personnes sourdes franco-ontariennes.



Designation of 12 agencies under theFrench Language Services Act(Summer 1992). (New total: 98)


Creation of a French-language school board in Prescott-Russell (January 1992).


Establishment of the Ministers Advisory Committee on a Cultural Policy for Francophones of Ontario as a result of recommendations contained in the report, RSVP!: Cls en mains/RSVP!: Keys to the Future, by the Working Group for a Cultural Policy for Francophones of Ontario. The interministerial committee (Culture and Communications, Office of Francophone Affairs) submits its final report in November 1992.


Establishment of two French-language community health centres, one in Sudbury and the other in Cornwall-Alexandria. A bilingual community health centre is also underway in Longlac.



Designation of 15 agencies under theFrench Language Services Act(Fall 1991). (New total: 86)


Creation of a grants program for the development of French-language community radio.


The Office of Francophone Affairs receives an allocation in order to develop a strategic plan for the provision of violence prevention services in French. Emphasis is placed on public education initiatives and on the development of direct services for Francophone women victims of sexual assault.


The Revised Statutes of Ontario are published in French.


Creation of a program for victims of sexual assault to improve French-language services for Francophone women.

Partir dun bon pas pour un avenir meilleur/Better Beginnings, Better Futures: a provincial project on services for children in difficulty includes a French-language pilot project in Cornwall-Alexandria.


Re-establishment of the Council on Franco-Ontarian Education (CEFO) to advise the Minister of Colleges and Universities and the Minister of Education on all subjects concerning French-language education programs at the elementary, secondary and postsecondary levels.

Creation of the Advisory Committee on Francophone Affairs (ACFA) to advise the Minister of Colleges and Universities on the issue of French-language postsecondary studies (July 1991).


Provisional report of the Select Committee in Ontario on Confederation, which recommends the maintenance of French-language services.



Designation of 24 agencies under theFrench Language Services Act(December 1990). (New total:71)


Setting up of the French-Language Education Governance Advisory Group (Cousineau Commission) responsible for recommending criteria for the governance of French-language education in Ontario.

Opening of Ontarios first French-language college of applied arts and technology,La Cit collgiale(Ottawa, September 1990).

Bourdeau Commissions report recommending the establishment of French-language colleges in Northern and Central/Southern Ontario.


Beginning of the installation of bilingual signage on provincial highways.


Amendments to article 136 of the Courts of Justice Act provide for other forms of hearings such as pre-trial and pre-motion conferences, as well as the filing of documents in French in certain regions.



On November 19, 1989, theFrench Language Services Actcomes into effect.


Creation of the firstCentre mdico-social communautaire(Toronto) that brings health and social services under one roof.



Designation of the first 47 agencies under theFrench Language Services Act. The first designated agency is the Hospital Notre-Dame in Hearst.

Canada-Ontario Agreement on the Promotion of Official Languages: Cooperation Agreement between the two governments to improve access to French-language services in provincial ministries.


Setting up of first French-language school boards in Toronto and Ottawa.


Creation of French-language community literacy centres.


Creation of the French-language daycare network,Rseau francophone de services de garde.



Dissolution of the Council on Franco-Ontarian Affairs and creation of the Ontario French-Language Services Commission.

Development and presentation of each ministrys implementation plans for French-language services for review by the Ontario French-Language Services Commission and the Office of Francophone Affairs.

Establishment of a linguistic evaluation centre by the Human Resources Secretariat.

Establishment and enhancement of the offices of the French-language services coordinators in ministries and certain crown corporations.


TVOntariosLa Chanebegins broadcasting. (January 1987)



Adoption of theFrench Language Services Act. This Act consolidates existing policies and recognizes the right of Francophones to receive government services in French in the 23 designated areas of the province.

Establishment of a simultaneous interpretation service in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario.


Enactment of legislation on school governance giving Francophones full and exclusive governance of their French-language schools and instructional units.



The Office of the Government Coordinator of French-Language Services becomes the Office of Francophone Affairs.

Read More



The various opinions expressed on this website are not necessarily shared by everyone whose photo is displayed.

This website has been visited 104411 times.